Jump to content
Customer Service 866.965.0400
  • 0

Waterless Wash vs. Diluted Rinseless on Bugs


SYMAWD

Question

Has anyone else noticed that WW seems to be a more effective bug remover than rinseless diluted 1:16?  When using diluted rinsless as a waterless wash I find that bug removal requires a few swipes of the towel, but when using WW, usually just one swipe is needed.  Anyone else notice this?  Perhaps a different ingredient that works better on bugs?

Edited by SYMAWD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I have not noticed any difference in cleaning power between the 2. Both work great as a pre-soak before a wash and loosen up dirt/debris and bugs on paint very well. Although, I always dilute rinseless for pre-soak, I only ever use waterless for door jams, trunk area and underneath hood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Does the waterless leave anything behind or no ? I am looking for a waterless that has cleaning power but leaves nothing behind. 

Looking at Megs D114 but want to check here first to see if Adams waterless leaves the surface clean and free of anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Does the waterless leave anything behind or no ? I am looking for a waterless that has cleaning power but leaves nothing behind. 

Looking at Megs D114 but want to check here first to see if Adams waterless leaves the surface clean and free of anything.

Adam's WW leaves absolutely nothing behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...