So...I'm still perplexed. I grabbed some waterless to try it out and see where/how to fit this into my product line up and usage.
I started out experimenting on wheels. After two full "quick detail" jobs on wheels using waterless, I swear the appearance is different than when I use detail spray...and by appearance I mean I prefer this better. I can't explain it, but I'm sure you guys have had similar experiences with products; an appearance you can't explain but know you like it better.
What's throwing me a mental block I think is the texture. Detail spray seems to cling better, seems thicker, and seems to offer better lubricity than waterless. Waterless seems extremely watery and runny to me, but clearly does the trick. Even did some touch up spots on paint tonight during a touch up job and was blow away.
One way I've heard it described it Waterless adds nothing to the surface, but instead just leaves a clean surface with the finish being of whatever your LSP is. Detail spray can tend to mask the qualities of your LSP and if built up, can mute the qualities. IDK.
I don't really know if there was a question in there or not, but mainly curious if you guys are seeing similar results and where/when/how you've added Waterless to your repertoire; and I'm mainly curious for instances other than doing a full body waterless wash. Has this assumed some type of QD role for you? Replaced detail spray?
And finally...I am going coating this year. Is Waterless better to use as a QD when needed on a coated car as it just cleans instead of coating or adding product to the surface?
Question
galaxy
So...I'm still perplexed. I grabbed some waterless to try it out and see where/how to fit this into my product line up and usage.
I started out experimenting on wheels. After two full "quick detail" jobs on wheels using waterless, I swear the appearance is different than when I use detail spray...and by appearance I mean I prefer this better. I can't explain it, but I'm sure you guys have had similar experiences with products; an appearance you can't explain but know you like it better.
What's throwing me a mental block I think is the texture. Detail spray seems to cling better, seems thicker, and seems to offer better lubricity than waterless. Waterless seems extremely watery and runny to me, but clearly does the trick. Even did some touch up spots on paint tonight during a touch up job and was blow away.
One way I've heard it described it Waterless adds nothing to the surface, but instead just leaves a clean surface with the finish being of whatever your LSP is. Detail spray can tend to mask the qualities of your LSP and if built up, can mute the qualities. IDK.
I don't really know if there was a question in there or not, but mainly curious if you guys are seeing similar results and where/when/how you've added Waterless to your repertoire; and I'm mainly curious for instances other than doing a full body waterless wash. Has this assumed some type of QD role for you? Replaced detail spray?
And finally...I am going coating this year. Is Waterless better to use as a QD when needed on a coated car as it just cleans instead of coating or adding product to the surface?
Sorry for the ramble...thanks guys.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now