G&G vs Ceramic Boost 2.0

[2017 Camaro]

Guys,

 

             I'm a huge fan of Guard & Gloss, but now I'm wondering, has anyone done a comparison of G&G vs the Ceramic Boost 2.0 as a stand alone coating? Better results, longevity etc.?  If anyone's done their vehicle half & half, I'd love to know the results!    Thanks!

[pirahnah3]

I have heard of a couple folks running comparisons on cars, and I think one person is even doing a split on a car to see. Def try it out and let us know what you think if you do it. 

 

I would not expect results from this for at least another 2-3 months unless one of the products fails in extraordinary fashion. 

[galaxy]

On paper alone, Boost is going to win the longevity category.  Haven’t used mine yet, and even though 2.0 is supposed to be significantly better than 1.0 to use, on paper G&G should stil edge out the ease of use category.  Looks/shine/results/appearance will be 100%personal preference; you’ll just have to try it and see what you like best. Water beading will be a neck in neck race with mmmaaaayyyybe the Boost taking the lead. Splitting hairs on that one.