WCW wipe down after waxing/glazing

[LQ9SS]

Yes, nothing beats a freshly waxed/glazed vehicle and I don't know if it just me, but it always seems to attract major dust especially after using BG.

 

My question is, would doing a Waterless Wash wipe down help reduce the dust after using Americana or Brilliant Glaze? Or would it remove or degrade the longevity of the wax/glaze?

 

I would think that the Americana would be fine but i'm not sure about BG.

 

Thanks fellas

[mbreyer]

WW or some DS will reduce some attraction but unfortunately adams is such a good product everything wants a good look:jester:

[mbreyer]

Since i beat nick

:worth:

[LQ9SS]

I promise i will get her all glossed up this weekend and take some pics. I'd rather not post a bunch of driveway shots.

[BRZN]

I understand the WCW is pretty safe. I almost always go over the vehicle with a California Duster and WCW prior to the application of any wax. Unless I just washed the car. Removing the dust to help eliminate any micro marring it may incur to the finish would be better than the minut amout of product removed by its use IMO.

[LQ9SS]

I understand the WCW is pretty safe. I almost always go over the vehicle with a California Duster and WCW prior to the application of any wax. Unless I just washed the car. Removing the dust to help eliminate any micro marring it may incur to the finish would be better than the minut amout of product removed by its use IMO.

 

No sure we are on the same page. I am talking about using the WCW after applying the wax/glaze to cut down on static and the oils left behind that might attract dust from the wax/glaze.

[Chris@Adams]

I do it all the time, the WCW does seem to cut down on the dust collecting on your paint!

[Team Adam's]

Early on in testing Waterless I accidentally found out it does dissipate some of the static from the vehicle. Have to figure with all the rubbing using statically charged microfibers, foam, and other things the paint develops a charge that attracts dust.

 

On my truck I always finish the detail with a waterless wipe down, even if its spotless, for this exact reason.

[LQ9SS]

Thanks dudes!!!

[BRZN]

No sure we are on the same page. I am talking about using the WCW after applying the wax/glaze to cut down on static and the oils left behind that might attract dust from the wax/glaze.

 

 

Woops, My Bad!

[LQ9SS]

Woops, My Bad!

No worries bro:rockon:

[MAYBEN]

Since i beat nick

:worth:

 

:worth:

[LQ9SS]

Alright, alright, lol...

 

Here is a pic that won me a free bottle of BG on another forum.

 

 

BTW, I threw on a fresh coat of Americana today followed by a WCW wipe down, and it drastically helped cut down on the dust.

[mbreyer]

Pics was plural sir. That means 2 or more. Nice pic let's see some more

[THE Mook]

Everytime I have used WW after waxing, I notice a real difference as opposed to when I don't....with dust and pollen attraction to the paint.

 

Dylan is right, the charge you bring to your paint really doesn't leave for some reason until the WW hits it.

 

Ask JD_SS---he was a skeptic until I proved him wrong!

 

Mook